الخلاصة:
The rules of weighting according to Imam Al-Shamakhi through the
section of worship as a model--book of Al-Idah (clarification)
Student: Faffa Nouraddin Said
Under the supervision of: Dr. Bakir Daoud Hammoudine
This study addresses an important topic that connects between origins
and jurisprudence, as it is also concerned with revealing a rich and
meritorious doctrinal thought, as well as reviving a legacy scientific
effort.
The aim of this study is to reveal the rules of weighting for the scholar
Imam Abu Sakin Amer, ibn Ali, ibn Amer ibn Sifaw Al-Shamakhi Al-
Nafoussi, one of the leading Ibadi who renewed the doctrine in the
Libyan country.
Al-Shamakhi played a significant role in serving the doctrine; by
establishing schools and educating people about their religion, and by
enriching the doctrine with literature that preserves his sciences and
opinions; such as the book of clarification in jurisprudence.
The study was planned by five themes. Under each theme, there are
subsections and branches.
Here we mention the most important points of the study:
The opening of the research demonstrates the concept of weighting
rules according to the fundamentalists, followed by a presentation
on the personal and scientific life of Sheikh Al-Shamakhi. I also
defined the Book of Clarification to highlight its content and some
features of the Sheikh’s approach.
I then mentioned the rules that the Sheikh had adopted in issues of
clarification, after following his issues one by one.
................................................................................................ ملخص البحث
016
By tracking issues of clarification, I found out the most important
weighting rules; It turns out that the Sheikh adopts the following
rules:
The first is weighting considering the Matn, in which I mentioned
weighting considering the operative, concept, general, news
associated with a threat.
The second is a second theme that I dedicated to weights
considering an external matter, which is in the book; the most
important thing I have recorded is weighting by approval of:
Legitimate texts, an act in the time of the Prophet Mohamed (Peace
be upon him) or his companions (May God be pleased with them),
and the doctrine or one of its imams, etc.
Third, weights considering reasoning fundamentals and
jurisprudential rules, in which the result is theoretical in terms of
dependent evidence, including: Sadd al-dhari’ah( prevention of the
means of corruption), Istihsaan (Judgment or view that is
favorable), Orf (Convention), Istishab (the principle of the
presumption of continuity), Massalih Al-Morssala (Public
interests).
As for the rules of jurisprudence: matters with their purposes,
certainty does not go away with doubt, hardship brings facilitation,
taking precautions…
The last theme reveals the weights in term of judgment:
considering the most likely, the reassurance of oneself....etc.
In each weighting rule, I cite a set of jurisprudential issues, which I
extract from the book of clarification of Imam Abu Sakin because
he is the subject of study.
As every work, it must be concluded. The results of the work will
be written in the conclusion, as well as practical recommendations
................................................................................................ ملخص البحث
017
that will contribute to the continuity of scientific research in the
correct direction without shortcomings. Main recommendations
are: The Book of Clarification should be reconfirmed in a revised
correct version, as well as performing comparative studies between
the views of Sheikh Al-Shamakhi and other scholars such as Imam
Mohammed Atfish and imams of other doctrines