الخلاصة:
The difference that the right to privacy knew was not a matter of
controversy as much as it was an indication of its importance as an
expression of its development. It was rejected at the beginning of its
inception and then the legislation retracted its rejection. Scientific and
technological means and the multiplicity of threats and the call for the
necessity of including it within the personal rights because of the
guarantees it enjoys, and from it, this debate was only an expression of
the development of this right and its transition from one stage to another
in search of protection that ensures its respect.
The violation of the right to privacy can also be achieved in one
of the three forms. It may be by violating it or violating it with regard to
matters that require confidentiality, such as the sanctity of the home and
the confidentiality of correspondence and calls, and by revealing it, such
as publishing the person’s financial aspect, political opinion and
religious belief because it may be known to others, but disclosure in
some situations causes Harm to the person, even if it is to praise him,
and not to raise some matters that have passed over time and have
become obsolete by being silent about them, and the individual seeks to
leave them in limbo, as raising them constitutes a prejudice to him.
